Bengt Gördén wrote: > Den Wednesday 09 April 2008 04.45.50 skrev Nick Copeland: > >>>> So why is there so low interest in LASH? >>>> >> That almost answers itself. Linux Audio does not exist in a vacuum. Most >> applications respond to the demands of the users since the developers are >> pushed along by necessity as much as their own interests. The demand for >> LASH features has been pretty low on LAU, the one submit here and there >> with a single response attest to that. >> > > Ok. Then it's best to speak up then. > > It could be because of several reasons. One might be that LAU people of today > are fairly up to speed with system administration and used to fiddle around > with lots of programs. But I think that when the audio distros gets more > attention, that would result in more and more people that aren't that fluent > in technical matters and that will eventually lead to demands like LASH. I > believe that it also could be one of the factors that would make up for a > good marketing point for audio under Linux. > > If there were LASH for qsynth, ardour, hydrogen, zynaddsubfx, muse and seq24 I > would definitely use it. And yes. I know that 50% of them have LASH but I > would like to see 100% :-) > > > /bengan > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > I'm not a dev at all... I just like to see more applications which are using LASH... a very welcome tool in a studio which can save a lot of 'configuration' and time... I think the best way to make lash 'populair' is using it a lot and ask the devs of your favourite app to make lash possible! And advice other people to use it, cause I have the idea that not many people now about the existence of LASH.... Dirk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
