"Lee Revell": > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:43 PM, naysayer <gateswideopen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hi crew... > > > > i have just been looking at the benchmarking stats for reiser4 and it looks > > pretty cool. i was wondering if there is there is any reason to implement > > this kind of file system in multimedia environments. i current have my > > root/system partition as reiserFS and my home partition as ext3. i find this > > to be quite efficient but perhaps if there would be an improvement to > > recording stability and speed, then perhaps it could work well with apps > > like ardour. although, reiser seems to be happiest with small files, reiser4 > > claims to be more efficient than ext3.... or that could be just spin. > > > > These days the choice of filesystem should make no significant > difference. Certainly it won't matter if an -rt kernel is used. > Well, doesn't reiserfs use quite a lot more cpu than ext3? I think that may make a significant difference... _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
