Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:43 PM, naysayer <gateswideopen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> hi crew... >> >> i have just been looking at the benchmarking stats for reiser4 and it looks >> pretty cool. i was wondering if there is there is any reason to implement >> this kind of file system in multimedia environments. i current have my >> root/system partition as reiserFS and my home partition as ext3. i find this >> to be quite efficient but perhaps if there would be an improvement to >> recording stability and speed, then perhaps it could work well with apps >> like ardour. although, reiser seems to be happiest with small files, reiser4 >> claims to be more efficient than ext3.... or that could be just spin. > > These days the choice of filesystem should make no significant > difference. I switched from ReiserFS to EXT3 quite awhile ago, and can't say that one is any faster than the other. A friend of mine switched from EXT2 to EXT3 on his server and reported a very large speed improvement, but he doesn't do audio work. -- David gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user