Re: [ANN] JAD 1.0 officially released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Phillips wrote:
tim hall wrote:

... you would be better off comparing JAD to the 32bit version of 64 Studio.

Yes, but the publisher wants me to profile a 64-bit audio system, and AFAICT 64 Studio is the only one in something like full bloom.

Fair enough. I'm running the 32bit version if you do need to compare notes.

However, I have a rough idea of what your partitioning schemes already look like and I don't blame you for not installing both. ;)

My partitioning scheme is a dividing wall. The JAD box is one room, the 64 Studio iron is in another. It's a necessary scheme, they attack one another ferociously if kept in the same space.

Aw, I'm sure they're just play-fighting. ;)

So long as I give my 64Studio box plenty of exercise and keep it away from 'artificial additives' it usually behaves itself.

cheers,

tim
/|\
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux