Re: [ANN] JAD 1.0 officially released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



david wrote:

.... I wonder how it compares to pure:bolic, dyne:bolic, Musix, Ubuntu Studio, Studio64, or what other's I forgot to include?

I'm writing such an article now for Linux Pro magazine.

However, I'm finding it slow-going. Comparing 32-bit JAD and 64-bit 64 Studio is unfair on various levels. They do share the common factor of being easy to install and configure, but there are significant differences after that. There are also many unique features I like about each distro.

I'm not compelled to take an "either/or" attitude, I like being more inclusive. In point of fact, the distros don't matter that much to me per se, they matter because they've taken care of the low-level work required for a low-latency system. It's not that I can't do that work, it's just that I'm far more involved in actually making music these days, which was my original intention in getting heavily involved with Linux audio in the first place.

Best,

dp

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux