Re: status of ams

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Folderol wrote:

You are not comparing like for like. ARM processors raw number-crunch in
FAR fewer clock cycles than x86 architecture. Typically 3x (I might
be a little out of date with those figures).

Hmmm, so you're saying it should compare to something like a dual 900mhz machine when running csound (or ams or zyn)?

That might be enough...

--
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://www.atte.dk      | quintet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
                        | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux