status of ams

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

I just rediscovered ams. What a nice synth! Actually I started implementing some of the few things I feel is missing. However it seems to me that nobody's using, at least the mailing lists are totally dead. So:

1) Anyone using it?

2) If not, why? Don't need/understand this type of synth? Use something else (what) instead? Technical reasons/limitations?

3) If you ever tried what did you love about it and what did you hate? Did you find user friendly? Did it perform well?

4) To rephrase 2): If the project was resurrected, what would it take for *you* to start using it.

5) Anyone (other than me) looked inside the code and interested in discussing certain aspects of that? Maybe even a joint effort to repair the quirks in ams?

Finally let make it clear that I don't have the time or knowledge to take over development of ams. But I'm interested in helping with bringing it to a state where it's a bit more usable...

--
peace, love & harmony
Atte

http://www.atte.dk      | quintet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk
                        | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux