On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:27:11 +0100 Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > I just rediscovered ams. What a nice synth! Actually I started > implementing some of the few things I feel is missing. However it seems > to me that nobody's using, at least the mailing lists are totally dead. So: > > 1) Anyone using it? Had just a brief look at it. > 2) If not, why? Don't need/understand this type of synth? Use something > else (what) instead? Technical reasons/limitations? It gets nice results but seems a *lot* of effort to get them. Also I'm used to fully polyphonic synths (both hardware & software). > 3) If you ever tried what did you love about it and what did you hate? > Did you find user friendly? Did it perform well? Not at all user friendly - couldn't find any help information. > 4) To rephrase 2): If the project was resurrected, what would it take > for *you* to start using it. Doubtful that I'd be interested actually. > 5) Anyone (other than me) looked inside the code and interested in > discussing certain aspects of that? Maybe even a joint effort to repair > the quirks in ams? Scary stuff! > Finally let make it clear that I don't have the time or knowledge to > take over development of ams. But I'm interested in helping with > bringing it to a state where it's a bit more usable... Kudos to you if you do, but personally I'd be more interested in (what you're already doing with) ZynAddSubFX :) -- Will J G
