Re: status of ams

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: status of ams
From: Georg Holzmann <georg.holzmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:21:46 +0100
In-reply-to: <45A11025.5090709@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <45A0E71F.1030505@xxxxxxxxx> <45A10582.7080109@xxxxxxxxxx> <20070107144719.GC6056@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <45A11025.5090709@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: georg.holzmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: IceDove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220)

Hallo!

A question for Frank: Can Pd's wiring be made invisible for a finishedpatched ? Even with subpatching I get some real rat's nests onscreen.

no, but you can use subpatches with "graph-on-parent" - then you willonly see the gui objects (and no wires or standard objects ...)


LG
Georg

References:
- status of ams
  - From: Atte André Jensen
- Re: status of ams
  - From: Dave Phillips
- Re: status of ams
  - From: Fons Adriaensen
- Re: status of ams
  - From: Dave Phillips

Prev by Date: Re: status of ams
Next by Date: Re: status of ams
Previous by thread: Re: status of ams
Next by thread: Re: status of ams
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux