On 3/5/06, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:39:42PM +1100, Loki Davison wrote: > > > Being completely ignorant about smack I don't know if > > > it sequences but if you do I'd encourage not doing it > > > by pattern interface. Use the percussion staff. It's > > > so much easier than pattern interfaces and if it did > > > realtime playback upon note input anyone could learn > > > to read the percussion staff in about 10 minutes. OK, > > > maybe five minutes. > > > > > > > Doesn't do sequencing ;-) > > > > > And if smack doesn't do sequencing then how about > > > something rare like good documentation. I'd love to > > > study synthesis I just haven't had the time to do it. > > > > > > > good idea... documentation.... don't have any of that at the moment.... > > What about your thesis paper? It's a touch verbose ;-) At 65 pages and it's not really that related, apart from the physical modeling stuff, which i don't ship with smack anyway because it's not really any good. I mean, if you want to use 95 % of cpu on a amd64 3000+ to have one (not great) conga it might be okay... It has got a solid intro on drums and info about modes, etc which would be helpful in understanding the synthesis stuff i guess. Some more load this and play with this knob docs i think are needed. Maybe i should do a video. ;-) Anyone got any other drums they want synthed? Or algos? Loki
