> Being completely ignorant about smack I don't know if > it sequences but if you do I'd encourage not doing it > by pattern interface. Use the percussion staff. It's > so much easier than pattern interfaces and if it did > realtime playback upon note input anyone could learn > to read the percussion staff in about 10 minutes. OK, > maybe five minutes. > Doesn't do sequencing ;-) > And if smack doesn't do sequencing then how about > something rare like good documentation. I'd love to > study synthesis I just haven't had the time to do it. > good idea... documentation.... don't have any of that at the moment.... > Alwright, disreguard both of those ideas and get smack > and it's dependencies to compile on FC whatever. Never > mind, I'm being a dickhead. Seriously, smack looks > like good stuff. One of these days I'd like to try it. > Thanks ;-) > > ron > > > Loki > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
