--- Loki Davison <loki.davison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am searching for ideas for what to add next to > smack ( > smack.berlios.de ). Any ideas? I.e what drum sounds > do you want > synthed that smack doesn't do. Has anyone got ideas > for other drum > algos or patches etc? I've got to add something cool > to the next > release apart from just neatening it up... ;-) Being completely ignorant about smack I don't know if it sequences but if you do I'd encourage not doing it by pattern interface. Use the percussion staff. It's so much easier than pattern interfaces and if it did realtime playback upon note input anyone could learn to read the percussion staff in about 10 minutes. OK, maybe five minutes. And if smack doesn't do sequencing then how about something rare like good documentation. I'd love to study synthesis I just haven't had the time to do it. Alwright, disreguard both of those ideas and get smack and it's dependencies to compile on FC whatever. Never mind, I'm being a dickhead. Seriously, smack looks like good stuff. One of these days I'd like to try it. ron > Loki > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
