Le Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:01:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 01:51:09 +0200, Dominique Michel wrote: ... > >How I see it is than several leading commercial linux distributions > >like redhat have huge corporations as paid customers, and these corps > >need these kits stuffs and systemd, or at least they was convinced > >they need it... But into a dedicated or home computer, they are just > >"usines à gaz" (gas plant - these manufactures full with pipes > >everywhere and going in all possible directions at the same time) > >and a complete pain in the ass to manage as a result. > > There is a difference between being really hit by systemd pitfalls and > baseless bikeshedding. Major distros decided to migrate to systemd for > valid reasons, it's not a conspiracy done by mentally handicapped > and/or evil distro maintainers. I was not talking about conspiracy. Corps have other needs regarding security than a home computer or a dedicated workstation. *kits and systemd offer a way to implement these needs. And maybe it is other reasons I don't know. > > Don't get me wrong, users could have good reasons to be against > systemd and/or against policykit and similar things. I already explained them. And it is one more: I just have other things to do with my free time than to rtfm the huge systemd documentation. Which also pose the question of the management cost of systemd for a corporation - they must have peoples which can manage it, or they will have to pay some other company to manage it. -- If you have a problem and you are not doing anything to fix it, you are at the heart of the problem. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
