Got ya, thanks for clarifying.
Just for the record, most of my works are actually released under CC0. Not all websites allow that (and not all jurisdictions). So on many websites I release in some form of CC.On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Massimo Barbieri <massimo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Louigi!
Il 01/11/2016 18:55, Louigi Verona ha scritto:
> It seems that the only limitation you really care about is money.
No, it's not! The page of my website in which I talk about the
philosophy of my musical project is called "Free as in freedom".
I do care about freedom.
http://johnoption.org/?page_id=9
> 1. This has little to do with free and proprietary software. Proprietary
> software
> can be free (and huge amounts of it is). Open Source could be paid
> (it rarely is).
Right!
> 2. Money is not the only limitation possible in life. GPL is a very strict,
> non-permissive license. The only license that is truly fully permissive
> is CC0. If you are using a CC Attribution Share Alike, you are forcing
> me to share my product as well.
Forcing you to share your product as well is what I want to do!
> This is a limitation and I frequently decide not to use someone's work
> because they say it should not be used in a commercial product. If I
> want to sell my music at Bandcamp, I cannot use this work.
I feel that if I use free software, free music, free culture etc... I
should give back something.
> I think it is your right to license your products however you want, but
> you cannot claim that there are no limitations simply because you are
> not asking for money.
I agree.
Ciao,
Max
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.com/
http://www.louigiverona.com/
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user