Il 31/10/2016 20:17, Louigi Verona ha scritto: > There is simply no time in the world that anyone can review code for > even one sophisticated > piece of software they are using. So those claims of free software > activists are mostly irrelevant > for the ordinary user and are no more than sound bites. Hi folks! If you do not have enough time, or competence like me, to review source code of the software you use, there are people that do this boring work for you in order to assure you that the software you use will do exactly what you expect. This people are the contributors developers, and we have at least 71 people who control Ardour[1] for you, and 26 who control Hydrogen[2] for you. And you can talk with them asking for bugs correction, new features or more stability, if this is what you are looking for. A very different approach from the proprietary software. I do not expect that a software that I use for recording music can do nasty or evil things. But what about an email client, or a browser, or an operative system? I complete agree with yPhil, and that's why I applied the free software reasons to my music, and I share not only my songs, but even my single recordings tracks and Ardour project with a CC-BY-SA license. Please, see: http://johnoption.org/?page_id=9 Ciao, Max-B 1. https://github.com/Ardour/ardour 2. https://github.com/hydrogen-music/hydrogen -- IM: massimo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - OpenPGP Key-Id: 0x5D168FC1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
