Hey Louigi! Il 01/11/2016 18:55, Louigi Verona ha scritto: > It seems that the only limitation you really care about is money. No, it's not! The page of my website in which I talk about the philosophy of my musical project is called "Free as in freedom". I do care about freedom. http://johnoption.org/?page_id=9 > 1. This has little to do with free and proprietary software. Proprietary > software > can be free (and huge amounts of it is). Open Source could be paid > (it rarely is). Right! > 2. Money is not the only limitation possible in life. GPL is a very strict, > non-permissive license. The only license that is truly fully permissive > is CC0. If you are using a CC Attribution Share Alike, you are forcing > me to share my product as well. Forcing you to share your product as well is what I want to do! > This is a limitation and I frequently decide not to use someone's work > because they say it should not be used in a commercial product. If I > want to sell my music at Bandcamp, I cannot use this work. I feel that if I use free software, free music, free culture etc... I should give back something. > I think it is your right to license your products however you want, but > you cannot claim that there are no limitations simply because you are > not asking for money. I agree. Ciao, Max -- IM: massimo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - OpenPGP Key-Id: 0x5D168FC1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
