because
(a) even in the open source world, people still have remarkably different opinions about The Right Way To Do Things, and The Right Things To DoOn Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Carter <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The argument against this seems to be basically, it can't happen because people have differing financial interests in having their own proprietary solution which they want to keep private.But this is not the proprietary world here, this is the world of open source. So what's the problem with doing it anyway? Maybe it takes off and maybe even gets used eventually in proprietary stuff (if that's what you want)On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:16 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:00:04 -0400
Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, the plugin (and DAW and audio technology worlds) simply haven't
> worked that way in a long time, if ever.
>
> We never even managed to agree on a way to share a tempo map in
> JACK ... you think it is somehow easier to agree on how to share
> "this is what i think the current spectral energy of my track looks
> like?"
No-one says it's easy. Just looking at the extremely basic discussion
here, and the circonvolutions thereof, we can easily (and this is the
easy part) foresee that the effort would be of Gargantuan proportions :)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
