On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:28:37 -0400 Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > let me offer you a hint. Good ! > what the plugins need to share are not messages but computer > (analysis) data. So much for the hint. > normally (though not universally), when entities run inside a single > process and need to share information, they do so by sharing access to > memory. This is writing to say nothing. You are going down on choosing the size and type of bolts when the discussion is obviously at a much higher, general level. You have out forward your level of expertise a few times in a few exchanges in various places. I will not do likewise, sorry. > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:45:10 -0400 > > Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:35 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > I disagree on that, based on so many protocols existing out > > > > there that are not proprietary, that can be used openly. > > > > > It isn't about the existence of protocols, it's about the > > > complexity of doing this via protocols at all. > > > > Well, if one uses OSPF to try to do VRRP... _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
