On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:38:23 +0000 Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 07:07:46PM -0400, jonetsu wrote: > > > It's really up to the individual, really. Some, it seems, can get > > easily influenced to become lazy. > > (Ralf) > > ... in case the audio engineer should be unable to distinguish > > a vocal track from a guitar track ... > > That probably describes the target audience for this sort of > thing rather well. > > IMHO an 'audio engineer' adding this sort of processing (EQ + > compressor + mutiband compressor + exciter) to a vocal track > after having listened to it for 10 seconds is showing his/her > incompetence rather clearly. What is amusing is how this can be distorted. Speak about processing. But this is interesting, this reaction. > (Ralf) > > ... in case the audio engineer should be unable to distinguish > > a vocal track from a guitar track ... And so on for any other machine that can detect something automatically in every day life: the user is a moron. An automatic transmission would be one example. So if there is any kind of audio analysis going on, then it means that the "audio engineer" is actually really caught between apostrophes. Any type of analysis, whether or not this analysis includes identifying an instrument. > It would be an interesting experiment to record the result to > a new track and let the 'track assistant' decide again. And > again, and again. Could be amusing. What's the point ? Just like a human. How many mixes can you do of a set of track. Unless that human thinks he's perfect, of course. In wither case it is amusing. (Ralf) > What do you try to archive? A discussion maybe ? But we got it after all, isn't it. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
