Re: The future of audio plugins ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:35 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> You talked about a suite of plugins which auto-configure themselves
> based on track analysis. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that doesn't
> require (just) inter-plugin communication, it requires that the
> entire suite is developed together as a unit, you can't just make
> different random plugins talk together and magically "make a decision
> together" - whatever that means - (hence Paul Davis' fist comment:
> "[to] do what they want, they need their own DAW").

I disagree on that, based on so many protocols existing out there that
are not proprietary, that can be used openly.

It isn't about the existence of protocols, it's about the complexity of doing this via protocols at all.
 
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux