On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Len Ovens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Having said all this. I personally wonder (yes I invite comments) about > the future of jackd (both 1 and 2). All our software is pushed by personal > itch and it seems to me that there is little if any personal itch left in > the jackd development camp. Plugins and internal routing are making jackd > less useful in some cases... but there is still a lot of SW that depends > on jack for it's use. > > -- > Len Ovens > www.ovenwerks.net This is rather like the home audio argument: all-in-one or separates. Personally, I go for the separates every time. You have far more flexibility and are not constrained to what the maker supports. I'm rather of the opinion that you can also have a much leaner operation. Do you want a Swiss army knife, or a precision tool? I've no doubt others will disagree :) -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
