On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote: > Great. trivially simple cases are those which are best left as exercise > to the reader, right? :) It would be trivial for someone familiar with the Ardour code. For me it would probably take a few days to get to grips with the build environment, the dependencies and finally the code itself. Half a year ago I worked most of two weeks implementing some rather fundamental changes in Jack1. At least 95% of that time was spent getting familiar with the existing code in order to have at least an idea of the consequences of the changes I needed to make. The algorithm itself that I implemented was not the problem, I could dream it. The only result is that I got slapped on my wrists for cleaning up the inconsistent and outright confusing layout of the parts of the code that I needed to understand. In the end the only difference between what I did and the 'official' style was the placement of matching braces (*) Not really motivating me to contribute again. As far as I know (half a year later) I just wasted my time. Ciao, (*) I put them either on the same line or in the same column. This provides strong visual cues to code structure. For those who don't like that there are tools to change this to whatever scheme they like without much effort. -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
