On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Roger wrote:
These articles may be of interest.
http://www.rane.com/note151.html
http://www.rane.com/note110.html
Nothing that I didn't "know", but laid out in a good way so I can practice
what I know. (If that makes any sense)
I always try to run all PA and band equipment from the same circuit if
capacity is sufficient. The previously
This is where we are at now. The power cable from mixer to stage is about
100ft(30m) and good heavy size wire.
As an aside... I don't think I will need it at this point, The isolation
boxes that are easy to get are "DI" boxes tha go from high impedance
unball to low impedance bal. Would these still work to go from a ballanced
output to an unballanced input? Or do I need a one to one isolator? Or
does it depend on the powered monitor? How does this one look:
http://www.rolls.com/pdf/M_HE18.pdf
Having "solved" my problem with a single power source, would it still be
worth while isolating all stage amps from the mixer? I think I will run
ballanced audio through the snake and do the cable adapting at the stage
end anyway. Right now there is a TS plugged directly into a TRS mixer
output which means the signal minus is grounded. There are two unused
(unusable) snake lines I could use where we have the DVD and computer
plugged in as line level.
Hmm, more thought required, the DVD/computer may need changes too.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
