Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: qcom: Add camera clock controller driver for SM8150

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/11/2024 3:21 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 10/07/2024 23:10, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
- Why is cam_cc_gdsc_clk not modelled in the clock framework?

This clock is kept enabled from probe, hence not required to be modelled
explicitly.
Yes, I'm asking why it's kept up enabled from probe rather than via
clock framework?

FWIW my preference is to do it as Dmitry is suggesting here.

I'm not a big fan of hitting the register and leaving it as-is, would much prefer to move to the model of having the CCF do it - so that for example the clock appears in the /sys clock summary.


This clock is PoR ON clock and expected to be always enabled from HW perspective, we are just re-ensuring it is ON from probe. Modelling this clock is unnecessary, and we have been following this approach for  gdsc clock in all the recent chipsets, like for example sm8550 camcc.


---
bod




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux