On 21/03/2023 20:49, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 12:45:13PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 18/03/2023 13:18, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
port is required to instantiate a remote-endpoint which can receive
orientation-switch messages from a Type-C mux.
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/phy/qcom,sc7180-qmp-usb3-dp-phy.yaml | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc7180-qmp-usb3-dp-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc7180-qmp-usb3-dp-phy.yaml
index 52886cdb0e506..1c887e34b1223 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc7180-qmp-usb3-dp-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc7180-qmp-usb3-dp-phy.yaml
@@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ properties:
description: Flag the port as possible handler of orientation switching
type: boolean
+ port:
+ $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
+ description:
+ A port node to link the PHY to a TypeC controller for the purpose of
+ handling altmode muxing and orientation switching.
Please extend the example as well.
Don't you have there two ports? USB and DP?
Or 3: USB, DP, and connector.
Please make sure this all aligns with what Bjorn and I discussed
recently. It was for glink specifically.
Rob
This is a PHY though, the DP, USB endpoints will go into the connector
or into the typec node itself.
---
bod
