On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:00:54PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: >> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > No, this isn't an either/or thing - the dependency is absolutely >> > mandatory if the device needs SPMI. The defconfigs are a separate >> > thing, they just exist to give people a starting point for configuring >> > their kernel so if the device using SPMI is important for relevant >> > systems the defconfig needs to be set up to enable it but that's >> > separate to the dependency since there's no need for people to ever even >> > look at defconfigs. > >> Then config REGMAP_SPMI should depend on SPMI, right? > > No, REGMAP_SPMI is not something that can be enabled directly - it is > selected by its users which should be ensuring that SPMI is enabled as > it is difficult to see a use case for REGMAP_SPMI which does not do > this. > > A dependency from a selected symbol will have no effect. Thanks Mark. So essentially in this case PMIC driver should 'select SPMI'. Right? -- Thanks and Regards Pramod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
