On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:00:54PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > No, this isn't an either/or thing - the dependency is absolutely > > mandatory if the device needs SPMI. The defconfigs are a separate > > thing, they just exist to give people a starting point for configuring > > their kernel so if the device using SPMI is important for relevant > > systems the defconfig needs to be set up to enable it but that's > > separate to the dependency since there's no need for people to ever even > > look at defconfigs. > Then config REGMAP_SPMI should depend on SPMI, right? No, REGMAP_SPMI is not something that can be enabled directly - it is selected by its users which should be ensuring that SPMI is enabled as it is difficult to see a use case for REGMAP_SPMI which does not do this. A dependency from a selected symbol will have no effect.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
