Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] soc: qcom: do not disable the iface clock in probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:39:02AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:

<snip>

> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_gsbi.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_gsbi.c
> >> index ab7b441..64fb298 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_gsbi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_gsbi.c
> >> @@ -22,44 +22,63 @@
> >> #define GSBI_CTRL_REG		0x0000
> >> #define GSBI_PROTOCOL_SHIFT	4
> >>
> >> +struct gsbi_info {
> >> +	struct clk *hclk;
> >> +	u32 mode;
> >> +	u32 crci;
> >> +};
> 
> What does mode and crci have to do with this patch? Can't we just put
> the clock into the platform data?

I second this notion.

-- 
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux