Hi Firoz, On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:23:21PM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote: > > > So If you confirm I can send v5 without '64' to 'n64' conversion (not just above > > > one, completely from this patch series). Or uou can take a call just > > > keep this macro - > > > _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 as it is and change it rest of the place. > > > > Let's just go ahead & leave everything as 64, and I'll do the 64 -> n64 > > rename later. I hoped whilst you were adding n64-specific code this > > would be an easy change, but at this point let's just prioritize getting > > the series applied without the naming change so it can sit in -next for > > a while before the merge window. > > I'll keep the macro - _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 same and will not change the rest > of the patch series. Unfortunately, reverting back to 64 from n64 has lots of > work. I've applied v5 but undone the change from __NR_64_* to __NR_N64_* because it's part of the UAPI & a github code search showed that it's actually used. Could you take a look at this branch & check that you're OK with it before I push it to mips-next? git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git test-syscalls https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git/log/?h=test-syscalls Thanks, Paul
