Hi Paul, On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 03:58, Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Firoz, > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:04:47AM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote: > > > > Sure, I think '64' to 'n64' conversion must be remove it from this patch > > series.I can send v5 without '64' to 'n64' conversion. > > > > If we rename '64' to 'n64' in half of the place and this _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 > > if we half to keep it in same looks not good (according to me). > > > > (FYI, This macro name - _MIPS_SIM_ABIN64 must be _MIPS_SIM_NABI64 > > and defintion will be: > > +#define _MIPS_SIM_NABI64 _MIPS_SIM_ABI64) > > > > So If you confirm I can send v5 without '64' to 'n64' conversion (not just above > > one, completely from this patch series). Or uou can take a call just > > keep this macro - > > _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 as it is and change it rest of the place. > > Let's just go ahead & leave everything as 64, and I'll do the 64 -> n64 > rename later. I hoped whilst you were adding n64-specific code this > would be an easy change, but at this point let's just prioritize getting > the series applied without the naming change so it can sit in -next for > a while before the merge window. I'll keep the macro - _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 same and will not change the rest of the patch series. Unfortunately, reverting back to 64 from n64 has lots of work. Thanks Firoz
