Hi Firoz,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:04:47AM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
> > > Will this below change will help?
> > >
> > > #define _MIPS_SIM_ABI32 1
> > > #define _MIPS_SIM_NABI32 2
> > > #define _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 3
> > > +#define _MIPS_SIM_ABIN64 _MIPS_SIM_ABI64
> >
> > Hmm, I think I'd prefer that we just keep using _MIPS_SIM_ABI64.
>
> Sure, I think '64' to 'n64' conversion must be remove it from this patch
> series.I can send v5 without '64' to 'n64' conversion.
>
> If we rename '64' to 'n64' in half of the place and this _MIPS_SIM_ABI64
> if we half to keep it in same looks not good (according to me).
>
> (FYI, This macro name - _MIPS_SIM_ABIN64 must be _MIPS_SIM_NABI64
> and defintion will be:
> +#define _MIPS_SIM_NABI64 _MIPS_SIM_ABI64)
>
> So If you confirm I can send v5 without '64' to 'n64' conversion (not just above
> one, completely from this patch series). Or uou can take a call just
> keep this macro -
> _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 as it is and change it rest of the place.
Let's just go ahead & leave everything as 64, and I'll do the 64 -> n64
rename later. I hoped whilst you were adding n64-specific code this
would be an easy change, but at this point let's just prioritize getting
the series applied without the naming change so it can sit in -next for
a while before the merge window.
Thanks,
Paul
