Re: [patch 00/47] Sparse irq rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hmm, that's probably a problem for all legacy interrupts which are
> never torn down once they are set up. And we set them all up during
> early boot.
> 
> So either we special case the legacy area or remove the warning
> alltogether.
> 
> Another option I discussed with Suresh recently is to remove the
> allocator in intr_remapping.c and just embedd irq_2_iommu into
> irq_cfg.

Just in case that's of use, on powerpc, we just special case the legacy
range. It's keep un-requestable unless somebody comes and explicitely
claims it (using a special flag for our virq scheme, typically only 8259
does it for us) and then we get 1:1 all pre-allocated and mostly
immutable.

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux