On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:23:12AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:14:27PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > The following patch series cleans up and mostly reimplements the core >> > sparse irq implementation and sanitizes the most complex (ab)user: >> > arch/x86 >> >> Hoy Thomas, >> >> patches 1-13 & 15 all look fine to me. Feel free to add my Acked-by: >> line. >> >> Patch 14 seems to be missing, and by inference it appears that the >> all important new allocator is added by patch 14. All of the rest of >> the series seems to be fine, but I'm forced to make assumptions about >> what the new allocator looks like, so I cannot be positive. > > Patch 14 was present, you were even CC'd on it. Hmmm... found it now. I'm not sure what happened there, but I couldn't find it the first time I looked. Most likely it is a PEBKAC failure. Sorry for the noise. Okay, patch 14 looks good to me too (including Yinghai's comment). The new allocator seems sane, and I didn't see any obvious errors in patches 16-47. I've not tested any of this yet. Hopefully I'll be able to carve out some time to do so early this week. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
