On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:23:12AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:14:27PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> > The following patch series cleans up and mostly reimplements the core > >> > sparse irq implementation and sanitizes the most complex (ab)user: > >> > arch/x86 > >> > >> Hoy Thomas, > >> > >> patches 1-13 & 15 all look fine to me. Feel free to add my Acked-by: > >> line. > >> > >> Patch 14 seems to be missing, and by inference it appears that the > >> all important new allocator is added by patch 14. All of the rest of > >> the series seems to be fine, but I'm forced to make assumptions about > >> what the new allocator looks like, so I cannot be positive. > > > > Patch 14 was present, you were even CC'd on it. > > Hmmm... found it now. I'm not sure what happened there, but I > couldn't find it the first time I looked. Most likely it is a PEBKAC > failure. Sorry for the noise. > > Okay, patch 14 looks good to me too (including Yinghai's comment). > The new allocator seems sane, and I didn't see any obvious errors in > patches 16-47. I've not tested any of this yet. Hopefully I'll be > able to carve out some time to do so early this week. Wait until I pushed out a fixed tree. In meantime I found out how I managed to screw up the quilt series :( Will post, once it's ready. Thanks, tglx