On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:16 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > So if you want your architecture to matter to me the rule is very simple: > contribute, contribute, contribute, and stop whining. If you dont contribute, > frankly you dont really exist to me. On the other hand if you are actively > contributing while your architecture only exists on paper, it already starts > mattering to me. > > I'm really that simple. So basically, what you are saying is that, totally regardless of how much an architecture is actually used in the field, if the architecture maintainer for it doesn't also do your work and contribute to every single of your pet projects, or if everybody is like you, every single other subsystem in the kernel, then that architecture is irrelevant for technical considerations and choices regarding any design decision made to the core kernel ? Sorry Ingo, but that's just arrogant bullshit. So stop trying to win this useless argument, all you manage to do is anger people and make us even less willing to actually work with you. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
