On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 21:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my killfile > > with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch from you. > > Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i > checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.) I disagree with that being a relevant argument in the technical discussion on the relative merits of two implementations of a given facility. I also disagree with your numbers, if you talk about deployement, I would be very very surprised if ARM wasn't close to on-par with x86. > In any case, i dont dispute that LMB is a bit cleaner than kernel/early_res.c > - and both are much cleaner than the new e820 kernel/fw_memmap.c code posted > here by Yinghai. > > If you dont disagree then please spare me the insults. (or move me into your > killfile) Well, I find some of your arguments quite insulting too, but let's move on. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
