On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 22:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > So no arguments from me at all about the code quality aspects - i just wanted > to highlight the huge amount of non-trivial work Yinghai has invested into > this already, with little external help, and that if possible it would be nice > to minimize the upsetting of related x86 code if possible. Please help him out > with more specific suggestions about how the two memory allocation spaces > could be unified best, to serve the needs of all these architectures - if you > have some spare time. Why not start by unifying the APIs to it, while keeping the implementation in the arch for now ? That would be a good first step and would give us a good idea of what kind of requirements all the archs have since to some extent those requirements need to be represented in this API. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
