* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Note the other side of the coin: LMB appears to be deployed on only 4 > > non-x86 architectures that muster ~1% of the Linux boxes while early_res > > is deployed on more than 95%. > > You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my killfile > with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch from you. Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.) In any case, i dont dispute that LMB is a bit cleaner than kernel/early_res.c - and both are much cleaner than the new e820 kernel/fw_memmap.c code posted here by Yinghai. If you dont disagree then please spare me the insults. (or move me into your killfile) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
