On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Those early_res patches were posted all over on lkml, it was literally > hundreds of difficult patches, and now, months down the line, after we've > tested and upstreamed it (with many nasty regressions fixed on x86 during the > development of it) you come with a rigid "do it some other way, convert all of > x86 over again or else" position. There's an easy solution here. Leave that gunk in arch/x86 where it belongs and if you want to unify things a bit, then do it at the -API- level only, and leave the implementation where it is. > I really wish non-x86 architectures apprecitated (and helped) the core kernel > work x86 is doing, because it is subsidizing non-x86 architectures all the > time. I'm not even going to bother replying to that one Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
