> -----Original Message----- > From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Rafael J. Wysocki > Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 4:57 PM > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J. Wysocki > <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux PM <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel > Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Len Brown > <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by > default > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:38 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > >> Rafael J. Wysocki > >> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:05 PM > >> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux PM <linux- > >> pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux- > acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > >> Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by > >> default > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi Rafael, > >> > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:19 PM > >> >> To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Len Brown > >> >> <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > >> >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Limonciello, Mario > >> >> <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by > >> >> default > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> This series is a follow-up for a BoF discussion during the LPC. > >> >> > >> >> The discussion was about supporting Linux on modern laptops and one > of > >> >> the issues mentioned was the lack of support for suspend-to-idle in > user > >> >> space and if there's anything that can be done about that in the kernel. > >> >> > >> >> The following patches are my input. :-) > >> >> > >> >> The first one reworks the suspend interface to allow the "mem" string > >> >> in /sys/power/state to represent multiple things that can be selected > via > >> >> an additional sysfs attribute. > >> >> > >> >> The second one makes ACPI select suspend-to-idle as the default > >> suspend > >> >> mode > >> >> if so indicated in the FADT. > >> >> > >> >> Please let me know what you think. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Rafael > >> > > >> > Thanks for submitting. I like the approach, especially that it leaves room > >> > to easily modify the behavior for debugging purposes and adding quirks. > >> > >> Well, that's the point. :-) > >> > >> > I tested your series on a machine that had this bit set in the FADT and > >> > confirmed that it set up and used policy properly. > >> > > >> > Tested-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thanks! > > > > Rafael, > > > > I hadn't noticed these merged into any of your linux-pm.git branches. > > > > Do you have a plan for merging them? Or waiting for other feedback? > > They are in the linux-next branch (and therefore in linux-next), so on > their way to 4.10-rc1. > > I usually only update topic branches at kernel.org when they are ready > to go into the mainline and the ones I have locally are merged into > the linux-next one beforehand. > > Thanks, > Rafael Ah thanks, I see 'em now. Sorry for the noise. ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
