On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:38 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >> Rafael J. Wysocki >> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:05 PM >> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux PM <linux- >> pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; >> Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by >> default >> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi Rafael, >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:19 PM >> >> To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Len Brown >> >> <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- >> >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Limonciello, Mario >> >> <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by >> >> default >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> This series is a follow-up for a BoF discussion during the LPC. >> >> >> >> The discussion was about supporting Linux on modern laptops and one of >> >> the issues mentioned was the lack of support for suspend-to-idle in user >> >> space and if there's anything that can be done about that in the kernel. >> >> >> >> The following patches are my input. :-) >> >> >> >> The first one reworks the suspend interface to allow the "mem" string >> >> in /sys/power/state to represent multiple things that can be selected via >> >> an additional sysfs attribute. >> >> >> >> The second one makes ACPI select suspend-to-idle as the default >> suspend >> >> mode >> >> if so indicated in the FADT. >> >> >> >> Please let me know what you think. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rafael >> > >> > Thanks for submitting. I like the approach, especially that it leaves room >> > to easily modify the behavior for debugging purposes and adding quirks. >> >> Well, that's the point. :-) >> >> > I tested your series on a machine that had this bit set in the FADT and >> > confirmed that it set up and used policy properly. >> > >> > Tested-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks! > > Rafael, > > I hadn't noticed these merged into any of your linux-pm.git branches. > > Do you have a plan for merging them? Or waiting for other feedback? They are in the linux-next branch (and therefore in linux-next), so on their way to 4.10-rc1. I usually only update topic branches at kernel.org when they are ready to go into the mainline and the ones I have locally are merged into the linux-next one beforehand. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
