> -----Original Message----- > From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Rafael J. Wysocki > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 3:05 PM > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux PM <linux- > pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by > default > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:19 PM > >> To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Len Brown > >> <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Limonciello, Mario > >> <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by > >> default > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> This series is a follow-up for a BoF discussion during the LPC. > >> > >> The discussion was about supporting Linux on modern laptops and one of > >> the issues mentioned was the lack of support for suspend-to-idle in user > >> space and if there's anything that can be done about that in the kernel. > >> > >> The following patches are my input. :-) > >> > >> The first one reworks the suspend interface to allow the "mem" string > >> in /sys/power/state to represent multiple things that can be selected via > >> an additional sysfs attribute. > >> > >> The second one makes ACPI select suspend-to-idle as the default > suspend > >> mode > >> if so indicated in the FADT. > >> > >> Please let me know what you think. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Rafael > > > > Thanks for submitting. I like the approach, especially that it leaves room > > to easily modify the behavior for debugging purposes and adding quirks. > > Well, that's the point. :-) > > > I tested your series on a machine that had this bit set in the FADT and > > confirmed that it set up and used policy properly. > > > > Tested-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! Rafael, I hadn't noticed these merged into any of your linux-pm.git branches. Do you have a plan for merging them? Or waiting for other feedback? Thanks, ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
