On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:40 PM, <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rafael, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:19 PM >> To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Len Brown >> <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Limonciello, Mario >> <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / sleep: Support for using suspend-to-idle by >> default >> >> Hi, >> >> This series is a follow-up for a BoF discussion during the LPC. >> >> The discussion was about supporting Linux on modern laptops and one of >> the issues mentioned was the lack of support for suspend-to-idle in user >> space and if there's anything that can be done about that in the kernel. >> >> The following patches are my input. :-) >> >> The first one reworks the suspend interface to allow the "mem" string >> in /sys/power/state to represent multiple things that can be selected via >> an additional sysfs attribute. >> >> The second one makes ACPI select suspend-to-idle as the default suspend >> mode >> if so indicated in the FADT. >> >> Please let me know what you think. >> >> Thanks, >> Rafael > > Thanks for submitting. I like the approach, especially that it leaves room > to easily modify the behavior for debugging purposes and adding quirks. Well, that's the point. :-) > I tested your series on a machine that had this bit set in the FADT and > confirmed that it set up and used policy properly. > > Tested-By: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx> Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
