Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] bitops: Introduce a more generic BITMASK macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 10:40 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:32:30AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 03:38 -0400, Chen Gong wrote:
> > > the point is we can use GENMASK like GENMASK(end_bit, start_bit) but
> > > we don't know the value of end_bit/start_bit at compile-time.
> > 
> > True.
> > 
> > The BUILD_BUG_ON idea is just to avoid people using
> > 	GENMASK(1, 2)
> 
> They'll notice the 0 pretty quickly when they test their code.
> 
> Let's add those checks only when it is really necessary and people have
> actually made that mistake repeatedly.

It's cost free to add the BUILD_BUG_ON
and perhaps you underestimate the runtime
bug checking effort,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux