On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:58:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:58:56 -0700 > From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > m.chehab@xxxxxxxxxxx, arozansk@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Winischhofer > <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard > <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] bitops: Introduce a more generic BITMASK macro > X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 > > On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 02:30 -0400, Chen Gong wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:59:09PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > [] > > > Maybe add a > > > > > > BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(l) && __builtin_constant_p(h) && \ > > > (h) < (l)) > > > > > No, if so, users can't use variables for this macro. > > __builtin_constant_p checks for constants > > Built-in Function: int __builtin_constant_p (exp) > You can use the built-in function __builtin_constant_p to > determine if a value is known to be constant at compile-time and > hence that GCC can perform constant-folding on expressions > involving that value. The argument of the function is the value > to test. The function returns the integer 1 if the argument is > known to be a compile-time constant and 0 if it is not known to > be a compile-time constant. A return of 0 does not indicate that > the value is not a constant, but merely that GCC cannot prove it > is a constant with the specified value of the -O option. > Yes, even we have following codes __builtin_constant_p still can return 1, so long as the value of variable can be identified. int len = sizeof(int); if (__builtin_constant_p(len)) { do_1; } else { do_0; } but the point is we can use GENMASK like GENMASK(end_bit, start_bit) but we don't know the value of end_bit/start_bit at compile-time.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature