Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] bitops: Introduce a more generic BITMASK macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 03:38 -0400, Chen Gong wrote:
> the point is we can use GENMASK like GENMASK(end_bit, start_bit) but
> we don't know the value of end_bit/start_bit at compile-time.

True.

The BUILD_BUG_ON idea is just to avoid people using
	GENMASK(1, 2)
instead of
	GENMASK(2, 1)

#define GENMASK(h, l)						\
({								\
	BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(l) &&			\
		     __builtin_constant_p(h) &&			\
		     (l) > (h));				\
	(((U32_C(1) << ((h) - (l) + 1)) - 1) << (l));		\
})


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux