Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] bitops: Introduce a more generic BITMASK macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 02:30 -0400, Chen Gong wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:59:09PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > Maybe add a
> > 
> > BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(l) && __builtin_constant_p(h) && \
> > 	     (h) < (l))
> > 
> No, if so, users can't use variables for this macro.

__builtin_constant_p checks for constants

Built-in Function: int __builtin_constant_p (exp)
        You can use the built-in function __builtin_constant_p to
        determine if a value is known to be constant at compile-time and
        hence that GCC can perform constant-folding on expressions
        involving that value. The argument of the function is the value
        to test. The function returns the integer 1 if the argument is
        known to be a compile-time constant and 0 if it is not known to
        be a compile-time constant. A return of 0 does not indicate that
        the value is not a constant, but merely that GCC cannot prove it
        is a constant with the specified value of the -O option. 
        


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux