From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> The ACPI handle of struct spi_master's dev member should not be set, because this causes that struct spi_master to be associated with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during the registration of struct spi_master). Consequently, acpi_register_spi_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the parent of the struct spi_master it is called for rather than that struct spi_master's ACPI handle (which should be NULL). Make that happen and modify the spi-pxa2xx driver, which currently is the only driver for ACPI-enumerated SPI controller chips, not to set the ACPI handle for the struct spi_master it creates. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c | 1 - drivers/spi/spi.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/spi/spi.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi.c @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static void acpi_register_spi_devices(st acpi_status status; acpi_handle handle; - handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&master->dev); + handle = ACPI_HANDLE(master->dev.parent); if (!handle) return; Index: linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c @@ -1168,7 +1168,6 @@ static int pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct platf master->dev.parent = &pdev->dev; master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; - ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&master->dev, ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev)); /* the spi->mode bits understood by this driver: */ master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH | SPI_LOOP; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
