On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 02:21:08AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > The ACPI handle of struct spi_master's dev member should not be > set, because this causes that struct spi_master to be associated > with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the > second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during > the registration of struct spi_master). Consequently, > acpi_register_spi_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the > parent of the struct spi_master it is called for rather than that > struct spi_master's ACPI handle (which should be NULL). > > Make that happen and modify the spi-pxa2xx driver, which currently is > the only driver for ACPI-enumerated SPI controller chips, not to set > the ACPI handle for the struct spi_master it creates. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
