On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 02:21:08AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > The ACPI handle of struct spi_master's dev member should not be > set, because this causes that struct spi_master to be associated > with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the > second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during > the registration of struct spi_master). Consequently, > acpi_register_spi_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the > parent of the struct spi_master it is called for rather than that > struct spi_master's ACPI handle (which should be NULL). Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> or does this need to be applied to the SPI tree?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
